VALE Vale
Re: VALE Vale
para mi es una baja mas bien técnica de cumplimiento de objetivos, el sector está rojo un 1% promedio, VALE 4%
lamentablemente tengo que darle la razón a los que la siguen por AT, gana plata, el IO viene bien dentro de todo, pero el papel lo mueve el mercado a gusto y piacere por mas que gane lo que gane.
lamentablemente tengo que darle la razón a los que la siguen por AT, gana plata, el IO viene bien dentro de todo, pero el papel lo mueve el mercado a gusto y piacere por mas que gane lo que gane.
-
- Mensajes: 15802
- Registrado: Mié Feb 01, 2006 6:27 pm
Re: VALE Vale
Luis..hay algo en esta zona de 9,10? me lo pregunto para ver si intentará ir a los 9,30-50 para desp seguir a los 8,xx
-
- Mensajes: 12747
- Registrado: Vie Abr 07, 2006 11:34 am
- Contactar:
Re: VALE Vale
Carlos86 escribió:Che avisenle a VALE que el iron esta levemente positivo, ¿a qué se debe tanta paliza?
Parte a la baja del sector y parte al real.
-
- Mensajes: 103
- Registrado: Lun Ago 01, 2016 2:40 pm
Re: VALE Vale
Aparentemente VALE ya no gana dinero... Ahhh no, para...
Re: VALE Vale
Che avisenle a VALE que el iron esta levemente positivo, ¿a qué se debe tanta paliza?
Re: VALE Vale
RECORD MARCH IRON ORE IMPORTS?
On the data front, it appears that China's iron ore imports will be high again in March, continuing their recent strength.
Vessel-tracking and port data compiled by Thomson Reuters Supply Chain and Commodity Forecasts show that an estimated 97.79 million tonnes of iron ore is due to, or has already, arrived at Chinese ports in March.
If the actual number is close to this estimate, it would be a record for monthly imports, and above the customs figures of 83.49 million tonnes in February and 92 million in January.
The vessel-tracking data typically comes in below the customs numbers, but even if the final numbers are below the current estimate, it's still likely that March will be an exceptionally strong month.
The point of concern in the prevailing market narrative is the level of port stockpiles in China, which rose to 131 million tonnes in the week to March 17, up from 113.9 million at the start of this year, and 65 percent above the low of 79.4 million recorded in mid-2015.
The level of inventories has been one factor regularly cited by market analysts as to why iron ore prices must inevitably decline, a process that finally appears to be underway.
While it's always difficult to predict how far prices will drop, it does seem the ongoing correction is likely to be steeper for the DCE futures than for the spot price, and the Singapore Exchange contracts, which are based on the spot assessments.
The SGX futures curve <0#SZZF:> is indicating a price of $65.89 a tonne for the contract expiring in December this year, a level closer to what many analysts would deem fair value.
But a measured decline to those levels would be unusual, given the recent history of price spikes and slumps in iron ore.
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN16U0FE
On the data front, it appears that China's iron ore imports will be high again in March, continuing their recent strength.
Vessel-tracking and port data compiled by Thomson Reuters Supply Chain and Commodity Forecasts show that an estimated 97.79 million tonnes of iron ore is due to, or has already, arrived at Chinese ports in March.
If the actual number is close to this estimate, it would be a record for monthly imports, and above the customs figures of 83.49 million tonnes in February and 92 million in January.
The vessel-tracking data typically comes in below the customs numbers, but even if the final numbers are below the current estimate, it's still likely that March will be an exceptionally strong month.
The point of concern in the prevailing market narrative is the level of port stockpiles in China, which rose to 131 million tonnes in the week to March 17, up from 113.9 million at the start of this year, and 65 percent above the low of 79.4 million recorded in mid-2015.
The level of inventories has been one factor regularly cited by market analysts as to why iron ore prices must inevitably decline, a process that finally appears to be underway.
While it's always difficult to predict how far prices will drop, it does seem the ongoing correction is likely to be steeper for the DCE futures than for the spot price, and the Singapore Exchange contracts, which are based on the spot assessments.
The SGX futures curve <0#SZZF:> is indicating a price of $65.89 a tonne for the contract expiring in December this year, a level closer to what many analysts would deem fair value.
But a measured decline to those levels would be unusual, given the recent history of price spikes and slumps in iron ore.
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN16U0FE
-
- Mensajes: 12747
- Registrado: Vie Abr 07, 2006 11:34 am
- Contactar:
Re: VALE Vale
kelui escribió:que feo que achicó, se cayó mal el volumen por suerte
- Adjuntos
-
- Captura de pantalla 2017-03-23 a las 11.37.55.png (39.04 KiB) Visto 1016 veces
-
- Mensajes: 15802
- Registrado: Mié Feb 01, 2006 6:27 pm
Re: VALE Vale
akademico89 escribió:Devaluo Brasil otra vez puede ser?
3.1266 +0.0387 +1.25%
14:17:38 GMT - Real-time Data. ( Disclaimer )
Type: Currency
-
- Mensajes: 103
- Registrado: Lun Ago 01, 2016 2:40 pm
Re: VALE Vale
Devaluo Brasil otra vez puede ser?
Re: VALE Vale
Marcos_44 escribió:Que contrato hay que mirar, el 1705 ? porque si es por volumen el 1709 mueve mayor volumen
Podes mirar el que vos quieras, pero claramente el mercado le dará mas importancia al que mas volumen tenga negociado. También tiene que ver con tus plazos.
Re: VALE Vale
Que contrato hay que mirar, el 1705 ? porque si es por volumen el 1709 mueve mayor volumen
Re: VALE Vale
kelui escribió:que feo que achicó, se cayó mal el volumen por suerte
Si, se ve claramente como sube con volumen y baja con 2 mangos.
Re: VALE Vale
que feo que achicó, se cayó mal el volumen por suerte
¿Quién está conectado?
Usuarios navegando por este Foro: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], elcipayo16, Erne530, excluido, GARRALAUCHA1000, Gon, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Microsules Bernabo, piraña, sabrina, sebara, Semrush [Bot] y 187 invitados