Página 827 de 1071
Re: C Citigroup Inc.
Publicado: Vie Abr 16, 2010 12:31 pm
por de_a_poquito
Quise llevar a USD 4.45 y no llegué, pegó un rebotín y está ahora en USD 4.56...
Igual creo que intradya serrucha un pocoa mas. La veo llegando abajo de USD 4.40 hoy, pero tarto de llevar antes para asegurar. Postr balance y post polvardea del GS, la semana que viene ya la tenemos en USD 5 otra vez. INHO.
Diego
Re: C Citigroup Inc.
Publicado: Vie Abr 16, 2010 12:31 pm
por Darth Trader
4.42 sería el próximo soporte de fibonacci (68%). Si lo perfora el siguiente es $4.
Slds.[/quote]
Lo respeto ....veremos el resto de la sesión

Re: C Citigroup Inc.
Publicado: Vie Abr 16, 2010 12:27 pm
por Linyera
dasan escribió:Algun grafico para saber si es 4,20 o 4,30 el piso para volver a entrar??
Gracias...........
4.42 sería el próximo soporte de fibonacci (68%). Si lo perfora el siguiente es $4.
Slds.
Re: C Citigroup Inc.
Publicado: Vie Abr 16, 2010 12:22 pm
por de_a_poquito
were escribió:muchachos ,,, me voy un ratito al cardiologo y vuelvo ,,,, si puedo

Tengo cita con el neurólogo a alas 17:30..y es posta, jajaja!!!
Igual, a no desesperar, baja un poquito mas y es oportunidad de compra. schic, shic, (como decía Nimo)

Re: C Citigroup Inc.
Publicado: Vie Abr 16, 2010 12:20 pm
por dasan
Algun grafico para saber si es 4,20 o 4,30 el piso para volver a entrar??
Gracias...........
Re: C Citigroup Inc.
Publicado: Vie Abr 16, 2010 12:14 pm
por de_a_poquito
Nota completa en el NYT:
.S. Accuses Goldman Sachs of Fraud
Brendan McDermid/Reuters
The new Goldman Sachs global headquarters in Manhattan.
By LOUISE STORY and GRETCHEN MORGENSON
Published: April 16, 2010
Sign in to Recommend
Twitter
comments (99)
Sign In to E-Mail
Print
Single Page
Reprints
Share
CloseLinkedinDiggFacebookMixxMySpaceYahoo! BuzzPermalink Goldman Sachs, which emerged relatively unscathed from the financial crisis, was accused of securities fraud in a civil suit filed Friday by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which claims the bank created and sold a mortgage investment that was secretly devised to fail.
Add to Portfolio
Goldman Sachs Group
Go to your Portfolio »
Readers' Comments
Share your thoughts.
Post a Comment »
Read All Comments (99) »
The move marks the first time that regulators have taken action against a Wall Street deal that helped investors capitalize on the collapse of the housing market. Goldman itself profited by betting against the very mortgage investments that it sold to its customers.
The suit also named Fabrice Tourre, a vice president at Goldman who helped create and sell the investment.
The instrument in the S.E.C. case, called Abacus 2007-AC1, was one of 25 deals that Goldman created so the bank and select clients could bet against the housing market. Those deals, which were the subject of an article in The New York Times in December, initially protected Goldman from losses when the mortgage market disintegrated and later yielded profits for the bank.
As the Abacus deals plunged in value, Goldman and certain hedge funds made money on their negative bets, while the Goldman clients who bought the $10.9 billion in investments lost billions of dollars.
According to the complaint, Goldman created Abacus 2007-AC1 in February 2007, at the request of John A. Paulson, a prominent hedge fund manager who earned an estimated $3.7 billion in 2007 by correctly wagering that the housing bubble would burst.
Goldman let Mr. Paulson select mortgage bonds that he wanted to bet against — the ones he believed were most likely to lose value — and packaged those bonds into Abacus 2007-AC1, according to the S.E.C. complaint. Goldman then sold the Abacus deal to investors like foreign banks, pension funds, insurance companies and other hedge funds.
But the deck was stacked against the Abacus investors, the complaint contends, because the investment was filled with bonds chosen by Mr. Paulson as likely to default. Goldman told investors in Abacus marketing materials reviewed by The Times that the bonds would be chosen by an independent manager.
“The product was new and complex, but the deception and conflicts are old and simple,” Robert Khuzami, the director of the S.E.C.’s division of enforcement, said in a statement. “Goldman wrongly permitted a client that was betting against the mortgage market to heavily influence which mortgage securities to include in an investment portfolio, while telling other investors that the securities were selected by an independent, objective third party.”
Mr. Paulson is not being named in the lawsuit. In the half-hour after the suit was announced, Goldman Sachs’s stock fell by more than 10 percent.
In recent months, Goldman has repeatedly defended its actions in the mortgage market, including its own bets against it. In a letter published last week in Goldman’s annual report, the bank rebutted criticism that it had created, and sold to its clients, mortgage-linked securities that it had little confidence in.
“We certainly did not know the future of the residential housing market in the first half of 2007 anymore than we can predict the future of markets today,” Goldman wrote. “We also did not know whether the value of the instruments we sold would increase or decrease.”
The letter continued: “Although Goldman Sachs held various positions in residential mortgage-related products in 2007, our short positions were not a ‘bet against our clients.’ ” Instead, the trades were used to hedge other trading positions, the bank said.
In a statement provided in December to The Times as it prepared the article on the Abacus deals, Goldman said that it had sold the instruments to sophisticated investors and that these securities “were popular with many investors prior to the financial crisis because they gave investors the ability to work with banks to design tailored securities which met their particular criteria, whether it be ratings, leverage or other aspects of the transaction.”
Goldman was one of many Wall Street firms that created complex mortgage securities — known as synthetic collateralized debt obligations — as the housing wave was cresting. At the time, traders like Mr. Paulson, as well as those within Goldman, were looking for ways to short the overheated market.
Re: C Citigroup Inc.
Publicado: Vie Abr 16, 2010 12:13 pm
por the ultimate
Esto es lo que saque y transcribo de la pagina hasta el momento:
12:04hs- Claramente esta situacion ha "descolocado" a mas de uno, ampliamos un poco el tema... la SEC realizo esta acusacion en el marco de un posible fraude en la estructura y venta de productos relacionados con las subprimes. La denuncia se enmarca sobre el hecho que el vicepresidente "defraudo" al brindar mala informacion y omitir datos claves sobre este tipo de productos.
11:57hs- CONFIRMADO EL RUMOR QUE VENIA HACIENDO FUERTE HACE MINUTOS... GOLDMAN SACHS ACUSADO DE FRAUDE POR LA SEC. Sus acciones caen el 10%.
Fuente:
http://www.ambito dolar.com
Por si le es de utilidad, saludos y abrazos para todos.
Re: C Citigroup Inc.
Publicado: Vie Abr 16, 2010 12:11 pm
por All Ramon
NEW YORK (TheStreet)--Goldman Sachs (GS) "defrauded investors by misstating and omitting key facts" about subprime mortgage securities it sold to investors, according to a complaint filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission Friday.
Specifically, the SEC is alleging that Goldman "structured and marketed a synthetic collateralized debt obligation (CDO) that hinged on the performance of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS)." Goldman shares fell nearly 8% to near $170 following the news on fears the firm's vaunted reputation may be in jeopardy.
"The product was new and complex but the deception and conflicts are old and simple," said Robert Khuzami, Director of the Division of Enforcement with the SEC, in a press release.
Re: C Citigroup Inc.
Publicado: Vie Abr 16, 2010 12:11 pm
por CHIQUI1
Acciones EEUU amplían caída por acusación fraude contra Goldman - RTRS
Viernes, 16 de Abril de 2010 12:09:31 p.m.
NUEVA YORK, abr 16 (Reuters) - Las acciones estadounidenses ampliaban el viernes sus pérdidas, ante un derrumbe de los papeles de Goldman Sachs GS.N , luego de que la Comisión de Valores acusó al banco de fraude con productos relacionados con hipotecas de alto riesgo.
El promedio industrial Dow Jones .DJI perdía un 0,67 por ciento, a 11.069,75 puntos, mientras que el más amplio Standard & Poor's 500 .SPX retrocedía un 1,22 por ciento, a 1,196.92 unidades.
Re: C Citigroup Inc.
Publicado: Vie Abr 16, 2010 12:10 pm
por de_a_poquito
U.S. Accuses Goldman Sachs of Fraud
Mortgage Investment Was Designed to Fail, Agency Says
By LOUISE STORY and GRETCHEN MORGENSON 1 minute ago
In a civil suit filed Friday, the S.E.C. accused the investment bank of securities fraud over a deal in which Goldman profited from bets against products it sold to customers
Fuente: New York Times
Re: C Citigroup Inc.
Publicado: Vie Abr 16, 2010 12:10 pm
por ponchy
Ojo con AIG y ABK..
Digo... al que le gusta....... le gusta.....

Re: C Citigroup Inc.
Publicado: Vie Abr 16, 2010 12:03 pm
por the ultimate
Segun ambito dolar publico hace minutos en su pagina que Goldman Sachs fue acusada de fraude por la SEC!

Alguien puede confirmar esto?. Saludos y abrazos para todos.